Ramesh vs Tara Bai — 6/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL

CNR: RJPG010004702023

Filing Number

64/2023

Filing Date

25-Apr-2023

Registration No

6/2023

Registration Date

12-May-2023

Court

DJ ADJ COURT PRATAPGARH DISTRICT HQ

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh

    Adv. Sh. Dharmachand Nagori

  2. 2.Badrilal

  3. 3.Vidhya Sagar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tara Bai

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    judgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The District Court of Pratapgarh, Rajasthan dismissed the appellant's appeal on 23.03.2026 regarding ownership and possession of a disputed well (naal) adjacent to his property. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the well belonged to him, as his ancestral will and property documents did not mention the well's ownership, and evidence showed the well was constructed on the defendant's authorized land. The court upheld the lower court's decision that the well belongs to the defendant/respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  10. 31-Jan-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  11. 28-Nov-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  13. 29-Aug-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  14. 01-Aug-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  15. 04-Jul-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  16. 09-May-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  17. 21-Mar-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  18. 28-Feb-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  19. 17-Jan-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  20. 20-Dec-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  21. 04-Oct-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  22. 23-Aug-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  23. 26-Jul-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  24. 10-May-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  25. 22-Mar-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  26. 19-Jan-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  27. 08-Dec-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  28. 20-Oct-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  29. 08-Sep-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District Judge

  30. 01-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District Judge

  31. 25-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District Judge

  32. 14-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District Judge

  33. 02-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 25-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District Court of Pratapgarh, Rajasthan dismissed the appellant's appeal on 23.03.2026 regarding ownership and possession of a disputed well (naal) adjacent to his property. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the well belonged to him, as his ancestral will and property documents did not mention the well's ownership, and evidence showed the well was constructed on the defendant's authorized land. The court upheld the lower court's decision that the well belongs to the defendant/respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case