Suresh, Guddi vs nil — 13/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed after Full Trial on 12th March 2026.
Family Main Case - FAMILY MAIN
CNR: RJMR260001372025
Filing Number
56/2025
Filing Date
08-04-2025
Registration No
13/2025
Registration Date
08-04-2025
Court
ADJ Jayal Taluka HQ
Judge
1-Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed after Full Trial
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suresh, Guddi
Adv. Inder Singh Rathore
Respondent(s)
nil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal
Disposed
Stayed by Higher Court
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-02-2026 | Stayed by Higher Court |
| 10-02-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 15-01-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 18-12-2025 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 13/2025 Summary: The Family Court granted a mutual divorce decree to petitioners Suresh and Guddi under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The couple was married on 05.02.2013 but separated over 7 years ago due to irreconcilable differences, with the wife residing at her parents' home. The court found no evidence of fraud or collusion and accepted their joint petition for dissolution on grounds of mutual consent, dissolving the marriage effective 12.03.2026. The court ordered each party to bear their own litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 13/2025 Summary: The Family Court granted a mutual divorce decree to petitioners Suresh and Guddi under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The couple was married on 05.02.2013 but separated over 7 years ago due to irreconcilable differences, with the wife residing at her parents' home. The court found no evidence of fraud or collusion and accepted their joint petition for dissolution on grounds of mutual consent, dissolving the marriage effective 12.03.2026. The court ordered each party to bear their own litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts