STATE vs Roshan Khan Advocate - SH. RAJENDRA SINGH RATHOR — 38/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,346,376. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJMR260000852023

Filing Number

41/2023

Filing Date

21-Mar-2017

Registration No

38/2023

Registration Date

21-Mar-2017

Court

ADJ Jayal Taluka HQ

Judge

1-Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

Jayal

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,346,376

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. ADD.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Roshan Khan Advocate - SH. RAJENDRA SINGH RATHOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Roshan Khan (Session Case 38/2023) Court: Additional Session Judge, Jayul (Nagaur District) Judge: Lakshman Ram Bishnoi (RJS) Decision Date: 30.03.2026 Verdict Acquitted Roshan Khan was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 363, 366, 346, and 376 (kidnapping, abduction, wrongful confinement, and rape). Key Facts The prosecution alleged that on April 4, 2016, the accused abducted a 19-year-old girl (victim) from her village, took her to Nagpur, and sexually assaulted her repeatedly over 9-10 months. Reasoning The court found critical inconsistencies and gaps in the prosecution's case: 1. Victim's prior relationship: Evidence showed the victim and accused had known each other for 4-5 years, with regular contact before the alleged incident 2. Contradictory statements: The victim denied the allegations in her initial police statement but later changed her account after parental pressure 3. Lack of corroboration: No video evidence, no car seized, no rental agreement for the alleged rented room 4. Voluntary departure: The victim left home of her own accord with academic documents and money, suggesting consent 5. Later willingness: Even after rescue, the victim wanted to marry the accused 6. Mobile phone available: The victim had a phone throughout and could have contacted family but didn't The court concluded the victim consented to the relationship and that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  10. 12-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  12. 27-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  13. 22-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  14. 15-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  15. 19-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  16. 27-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  17. 23-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  18. 21-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  19. 17-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  20. 03-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  21. 10-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  22. 08-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  23. 01-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  24. 27-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  25. 21-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  26. 12-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  27. 13-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  28. 07-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  29. 06-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  30. 30-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  31. 24-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  32. 27-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  33. 23-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  34. 02-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  35. 11-Mar-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  36. 03-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  37. 11-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  38. 26-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  39. 11-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  40. 07-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  41. 07-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add District and Sessions Judge, Jayal

  42. 03-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 21-Mar-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Roshan Khan (Session Case 38/2023) Court: Additional Session Judge, Jayul (Nagaur District) Judge: Lakshman Ram Bishnoi (RJS) Decision Date: 30.03.2026 Verdict Acquitted Roshan Khan was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 363, 366, 346, and 376 (kidnapping, abduction, wrongful confinement, and rape). Key Facts The prosecution alleged that on April 4, 2016, the accused abducted a 19-year-old girl (victim) from her village, took her to Nagpur, and sexually assaulted her repeatedly over 9-10 months. Reasoning The court found critical inconsistencies and gaps in the prosecution's case: 1. Victim's prior relationship: Evidence showed the victim and accused had known each other for 4-5 years, with regular contact before the alleged incident 2. Contradictory statements: The victim denied the allegations in her initial police statement but later changed her account after parental pressure 3. Lack of corroboration: No video evidence, no car seized, no rental agreement for the alleged rented room 4. Voluntary departure: The victim left home of her own accord with academic documents and money, suggesting consent 5. Later willingness: Even after rescue, the victim wanted to marry the accused 6. Mobile phone available: The victim had a phone throughout and could have contacted family but didn't The court concluded the victim consented to the relationship and that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case