Shivlal vs Gopilal — 22/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39R1,2CPC151CPC. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 07th May 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJMR160000472020
Filing Number
47/2020
Filing Date
06-08-2020
Registration No
22/2020
Registration Date
06-08-2020
Court
ACJM Degana Taluka HQ civil
Judge
1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivlal
Adv. Sahdev Prasad Swami
Respondent(s)
Gopilal
Santosh
Munni
Shimala
Durgali
Tehsildar
Up Panjiyan Adhikari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 05-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 04-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 01-05-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 22/2020: Shivlal vs. Gopilal et al. – Summary Court Decision (07.05.2026): The court dismissed the petitioner Shivlal's suit challenging a property sale deed dated 11.06.2020. The court held that Gopilal (respondent #1), as the adoptive father and manager of the joint Hindu family property, validly sold agricultural land to respondent #5 (Durguli Devi) for legal necessity—specifically for household expenses—without requiring the adopted son's consent. The court found Shivlal's adoption was legally valid per a registered deed dated 18.03.2014, and thus he had no right to challenge the sale of the joint family property made by the family manager in accordance with Hindu law. The sale deed was declared valid, and the suit was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 22/2020: Shivlal vs. Gopilal et al. – Summary Court Decision (07.05.2026): The court dismissed the petitioner Shivlal's suit challenging a property sale deed dated 11.06.2020. The court held that Gopilal (respondent #1), as the adoptive father and manager of the joint Hindu family property, validly sold agricultural land to respondent #5 (Durguli Devi) for legal necessity—specifically for household expenses—without requiring the adopted son's consent. The court found Shivlal's adoption was legally valid per a registered deed dated 18.03.2014, and thus he had no right to challenge the sale of the joint family property made by the family manager in accordance with Hindu law. The sale deed was declared valid, and the suit was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts