Khetaram vs Ramakishan — 17/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39R1,2CPC151CPC. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 24th March 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJMR160000342020
Filing Number
34/2020
Filing Date
01-07-2020
Registration No
17/2020
Registration Date
01-07-2020
Court
ACJM Degana Taluka HQ civil
Judge
1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Khetaram
Adv. Sahdev Prasad Swami
Respondent(s)
Ramakishan
Mayadevi
Shantidevi
Indradevi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Final arguments |
| 13-02-2026 | Final arguments |
| 11-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Khetaram v. Ramakishan and Others (17/2020) The Senior Civil Judge of Degana granted a temporary injunction in favor of the petitioners (Khetaram and Jagdish), restraining the respondents from transferring or selling disputed agricultural land without court permission until the main case is decided. The court found that the petitioners have a prima facie case as legitimate purchasers with possession, and that an irreparable loss would occur if the property is sold before judgment, outweighing any inconvenience to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Khetaram v. Ramakishan and Others (17/2020) The Senior Civil Judge of Degana granted a temporary injunction in favor of the petitioners (Khetaram and Jagdish), restraining the respondents from transferring or selling disputed agricultural land without court permission until the main case is decided. The court found that the petitioners have a prima facie case as legitimate purchasers with possession, and that an irreparable loss would occur if the property is sold before judgment, outweighing any inconvenience to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts