bheruram vs masturam etc. — 15/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 20th August 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 20-Aug-2026 this date has passed

Civil Suit

CNR: RJMR160000322024

Filing Number

32/2024

Filing Date

23-Apr-2024

Registration No

15/2024

Registration Date

23-Apr-2024

Court

ACJM Degana Taluka HQ civil

Judge

1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.bheruram

    Adv. Kamlesh Narayan Vyas

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.masturam etc.

Case History

  1. 20-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-May-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  6. 15-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  7. 13-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  8. 18-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  9. 26-May-2025

    Issues

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  10. 06-May-2025

    Issues

  11. 09-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  12. 31-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  13. 28-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  14. 23-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  15. 02-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  16. 03-Jul-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Bheruram v. Masturam (15/2024) Outcome: The respondents' application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC (read with Section 151 CPC) has been DISMISSED and REJECTED. The court found the application lacking merit because the respondents failed to properly establish that the petitioner's suit falls outside the civil court's jurisdiction—the dispute concerning a registered sale deed can only be heard in civil court, not revenue court. The petitioner's suit for declaration and permanent injunction regarding disputed land in Meswda village proceeds as filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 03-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  18. 01-Jun-2024

    Orders

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  19. 29-May-2024

    Orders

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  20. 16-May-2024

    Orders

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  21. 08-May-2024

    Orders

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  22. 04-May-2024

    Orders

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  23. 03-May-2024

    Orders

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  24. 01-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 23-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bheruram v. Masturam (15/2024) Outcome: The respondents' application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC (read with Section 151 CPC) has been DISMISSED and REJECTED. The court found the application lacking merit because the respondents failed to properly establish that the petitioner's suit falls outside the civil court's jurisdiction—the dispute concerning a registered sale deed can only be heard in civil court, not revenue court. The petitioner's suit for declaration and permanent injunction regarding disputed land in Meswda village proceeds as filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case