Chhoturam vs Devilal — 8/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39R1,2 CPC. Status: Final arguments. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJMR160000192020
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
Filing Number
19/2020
Filing Date
26-02-2020
Registration No
8/2020
Registration Date
26-02-2020
Court
ACJM Degana Taluka HQ civil
Judge
1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chhoturam
Adv. Kamlesh Narayan Vyas
Respondent(s)
Devilal
Kailash
Dalpat
Ugara Ram
Kachara Ram
Budharam
Kaluram
Aidan Ram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Rebuttal Evidence
Defendant Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 25-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 18-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 15-05-2026 | Rebuttal Evidence |
| 05-05-2026 | Defendant Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Chhoturam v. Devilal and Others (8/2020) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court permitted the petitioner (Chhoturam) to submit a photocopy of an original deed (patta) as secondary evidence, subject to correctness and truthfulness. The case is adjourned to 30 January 2026 for the petitioner's examination-in-chief. Key Facts: Chhoturam lost his original property deed when demolishing his old house two years prior. Despite efforts to obtain certified copies from the village panchayat (which had no records), he sought court permission to present a photocopied version as evidence under Section 60 of the Indian Evidence Act. The court granted this application, citing established judicial precedent recognizing photocopies as admissible when originals are unavailable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Chhoturam v. Devilal and Others (8/2020) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court permitted the petitioner (Chhoturam) to submit a photocopy of an original deed (patta) as secondary evidence, subject to correctness and truthfulness. The case is adjourned to 30 January 2026 for the petitioner's examination-in-chief. Key Facts: Chhoturam lost his original property deed when demolishing his old house two years prior. Despite efforts to obtain certified copies from the village panchayat (which had no records), he sought court permission to present a photocopied version as evidence under Section 60 of the Indian Evidence Act. The court granted this application, citing established judicial precedent recognizing photocopies as admissible when originals are unavailable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts