Chhoturam vs Devilal — 8/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39R1,2 CPC. Status: Final arguments. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.

Final arguments Next hearing 29-May-2026 this date has passed

Civil Suit

CNR: RJMR160000192020

Filing Number

19/2020

Filing Date

26-Feb-2020

Registration No

8/2020

Registration Date

26-Feb-2020

Court

ACJM Degana Taluka HQ civil

Judge

1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O39R1,2 CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chhoturam

    Adv. Kamlesh Narayan Vyas

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Devilal

  2. 2.Kailash

  3. 3.Dalpat

  4. 4.Ugara Ram

  5. 5.Kachara Ram

  6. 6.Budharam

  7. 7.Kaluram

  8. 8.Aidan Ram

Case History

  1. 29-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    Final arguments

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  3. 25-May-2026

    Final arguments

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  4. 18-May-2026

    Final arguments

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  5. 15-May-2026

    Rebuttal Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  6. 05-May-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  7. 02-May-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  8. 23-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  9. 21-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  10. 20-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  11. 16-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  12. 08-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  13. 07-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  14. 01-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  15. 24-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  16. 23-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  17. 12-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  18. 26-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  19. 23-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  20. 12-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  21. 06-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  22. 30-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  23. 27-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Chhoturam v. Devilal and Others (8/2020) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court permitted the petitioner (Chhoturam) to submit a photocopy of an original deed (patta) as secondary evidence, subject to correctness and truthfulness. The case is adjourned to 30 January 2026 for the petitioner's examination-in-chief. Key Facts: Chhoturam lost his original property deed when demolishing his old house two years prior. Despite efforts to obtain certified copies from the village panchayat (which had no records), he sought court permission to present a photocopied version as evidence under Section 60 of the Indian Evidence Act. The court granted this application, citing established judicial precedent recognizing photocopies as admissible when originals are unavailable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  24. 27-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  25. 21-Jan-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  26. 16-Jan-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  27. 17-Dec-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  28. 02-Dec-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  29. 18-Nov-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  30. 14-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  31. 15-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  32. 14-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  33. 30-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

  34. 23-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  35. 08-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  36. 23-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  37. 18-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  38. 28-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  39. 16-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  40. 15-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  41. 22-Sep-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  42. 17-Jul-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  43. 06-May-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  44. 27-Feb-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  45. 05-Dec-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  46. 21-Sep-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  47. 03-Aug-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  48. 30-Jun-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  49. 28-Apr-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  50. 05-Apr-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  51. 10-Feb-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  52. 14-Dec-2021

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  53. 27-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  54. 08-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  55. 20-Jul-2021

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  56. 21-May-2021

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  57. 24-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  58. 12-Mar-2021

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  59. 06-Jan-2021

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  60. 09-Nov-2020

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  61. 21-Sep-2020

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  62. 05-Sep-2020

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  63. 29-Jul-2020

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  64. 14-May-2020

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  65. 23-Mar-2020

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  66. 18-Mar-2020

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  67. 17-Mar-2020

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  68. 13-Mar-2020

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  69. 06-Mar-2020

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  70. 04-Mar-2020

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  71. 28-Feb-2020

    Written Statement

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  72. 26-Feb-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  73. 26-Feb-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Chhoturam v. Devilal and Others (8/2020) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court permitted the petitioner (Chhoturam) to submit a photocopy of an original deed (patta) as secondary evidence, subject to correctness and truthfulness. The case is adjourned to 30 January 2026 for the petitioner's examination-in-chief. Key Facts: Chhoturam lost his original property deed when demolishing his old house two years prior. Despite efforts to obtain certified copies from the village panchayat (which had no records), he sought court permission to present a photocopied version as evidence under Section 60 of the Indian Evidence Act. The court granted this application, citing established judicial precedent recognizing photocopies as admissible when originals are unavailable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case