Rajuram vs state — 127/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,452,323,379,427. Disposed: Contested--Disposed otherwise on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJMR150008392021

Filing Number

839/2021

Filing Date

08-Nov-2021

Registration No

127/2021

Registration Date

08-Nov-2021

Court

ACJM Degana Taluka HQ criminal

Judge

1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

186

Police Station

Degana

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,452,323,379,427

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajuram

    Adv. Jiyaram Rayal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 127/2021 - Rajuram v. State The court rejected the final report filed by police investigating FIR 186/2020, which alleged that Rajuram and others committed criminal offenses including rioting, house-breaking, assault, and theft. The court found that the FIR was filed to pressure a civil dispute over shop rental rights rather than on genuine criminal grounds, and determined there was insufficient evidence of the alleged assault, property damage, or robbery. The judgment accepted the petitioner's protest petition, quashed the FIR, and directed the case diary be returned to the police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  6. 14-Jan-2026

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  7. 26-Nov-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  8. 27-Oct-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  9. 28-Jul-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  10. 03-Jul-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  11. 03-Mar-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  12. 12-Nov-2024

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  13. 22-Jul-2024

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  14. 04-Apr-2024

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  15. 15-Dec-2023

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  16. 28-Aug-2023

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  17. 15-May-2023

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  18. 27-Jan-2023

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  19. 21-Oct-2022

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  20. 11-Jul-2022

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  21. 20-Apr-2022

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana

  22. 24-Jan-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 08-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 127/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 127/2021 - Rajuram v. State The court rejected the final report filed by police investigating FIR 186/2020, which alleged that Rajuram and others committed criminal offenses including rioting, house-breaking, assault, and theft. The court found that the FIR was filed to pressure a civil dispute over shop rental rights rather than on genuine criminal grounds, and determined there was insufficient evidence of the alleged assault, property damage, or robbery. The judgment accepted the petitioner's protest petition, quashed the FIR, and directed the case diary be returned to the police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case