Rajuram vs state — 127/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,452,323,379,427. Disposed: Contested--Disposed otherwise on 23rd April 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJMR150008392021
Filing Number
839/2021
Filing Date
08-11-2021
Registration No
127/2021
Registration Date
08-11-2021
Court
ACJM Degana Taluka HQ criminal
Judge
1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed otherwise
FIR Details
FIR Number
186
Police Station
Degana
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajuram
Adv. Jiyaram Rayal
Respondent(s)
state
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana
Disposed
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 25-02-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 14-01-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 26-11-2025 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 127/2021 - Rajuram v. State The court rejected the final report filed by police investigating FIR 186/2020, which alleged that Rajuram and others committed criminal offenses including rioting, house-breaking, assault, and theft. The court found that the FIR was filed to pressure a civil dispute over shop rental rights rather than on genuine criminal grounds, and determined there was insufficient evidence of the alleged assault, property damage, or robbery. The judgment accepted the petitioner's protest petition, quashed the FIR, and directed the case diary be returned to the police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 127/2021 - Rajuram v. State The court rejected the final report filed by police investigating FIR 186/2020, which alleged that Rajuram and others committed criminal offenses including rioting, house-breaking, assault, and theft. The court found that the FIR was filed to pressure a civil dispute over shop rental rights rather than on genuine criminal grounds, and determined there was insufficient evidence of the alleged assault, property damage, or robbery. The judgment accepted the petitioner's protest petition, quashed the FIR, and directed the case diary be returned to the police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts