state vs Papu singh — 283/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447,435. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 28th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJMR150005162017
Filing Number
516/2017
Filing Date
07-07-2017
Registration No
283/2017
Registration Date
07-07-2017
Court
ACJM Degana Taluka HQ criminal
Judge
1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Sentenced
FIR Details
FIR Number
123
Police Station
Thanwla
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state
Adv. p o
Respondent(s)
Papu singh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana
Disposed
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Service of Non-bailable warrant |
| 07-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Final arguments |
| 13-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Degana convicted Pappu Singh (age 60) on March 28, 2026, for criminal trespass (IPC § 447) and mischief by fire (IPC § 435) after finding him guilty of intentionally setting fire to a farmer's standing crop in Banwada village on September 25-26, 2016, causing financial loss. The court sentenced him to three months imprisonment and ₹500 fine for § 447, and three years imprisonment with ₹1,00,000 fine for § 435, rejecting the probation request on grounds that mercy was inappropriate given the serious nature of the agricultural destruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Degana convicted Pappu Singh (age 60) on March 28, 2026, for criminal trespass (IPC § 447) and mischief by fire (IPC § 435) after finding him guilty of intentionally setting fire to a farmer's standing crop in Banwada village on September 25-26, 2016, causing financial loss. The court sentenced him to three months imprisonment and ₹500 fine for § 447, and three years imprisonment with ₹1,00,000 fine for § 435, rejecting the probation request on grounds that mercy was inappropriate given the serious nature of the agricultural destruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts