state vs Kailash Advocate - Laxman Singh — 96/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJMR150001782020
Filing Number
178/2020
Filing Date
12-03-2020
Registration No
96/2020
Registration Date
12-03-2020
Court
ACJM Degana Taluka HQ criminal
Judge
1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
Degana
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state
Adv. PO
Respondent(s)
Kailash Advocate - Laxman Singh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Add. Sr. Civil Judge and ACJM,Degana
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 07-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 15-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Degana acquitted Kailash Ram of dowry harassment charges under IPC Section 498A. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant herself (PW1) testified that she had reconciled with her husband and did not want to pursue the case. The court held that without credible, consistent evidence from prosecution witnesses corroborating the dowry demand allegations, the accused was entitled to the benefit of doubt and acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Degana acquitted Kailash Ram of dowry harassment charges under IPC Section 498A. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant herself (PW1) testified that she had reconciled with her husband and did not want to pursue the case. The court held that without credible, consistent evidence from prosecution witnesses corroborating the dowry demand allegations, the accused was entitled to the benefit of doubt and acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts