state vs HANUMAN RAM Advocate - Sh. Rajendra Jaypal — 309/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJMR020004542017

Filing Number

454/2017

Filing Date

03-Mar-2017

Registration No

309/2017

Registration Date

03-Mar-2017

Court

ACJM JM Merta District HQ

Judge

4-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

Merta City

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.state

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HANUMAN RAM Advocate - Sh. Rajendra Jaypal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    judgement/orderView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: 309/2017 The Judicial Magistrate of Medta acquitted accused Hanuman Ram of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) due to insufficient evidence. While the prosecution proved a fatal road accident occurred on 28.01.2017 involving a motorcycle (resulting in the victim Munaram's death), no witness testimony established that Hanuman Ram was operating the accused vehicle at the time of the collision. The court applied the benefit of doubt, finding the driver's identity unproven despite medical and mechanical evidence corroborating the accident's occurrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  7. 08-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  8. 04-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  9. 17-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  10. 22-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  11. 16-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  12. 17-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  13. 17-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  14. 07-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  15. 26-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  16. 29-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  17. 07-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  18. 14-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  19. 14-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  20. 20-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  21. 19-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  22. 02-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  23. 05-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  24. 21-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Merta

  25. 05-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  26. 19-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  27. 29-Oct-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  28. 18-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  29. 02-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  30. 20-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  31. 07-Apr-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  32. 17-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  33. 05-Jan-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  34. 07-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  35. 13-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  36. 17-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  37. 30-Jan-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  38. 20-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  39. 23-Oct-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  40. 01-Aug-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  41. 03-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  42. 07-Feb-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  43. 15-Nov-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  44. 24-Aug-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  45. 05-Jun-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  46. 05-Apr-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  47. 18-Jan-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  48. 08-Nov-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  49. 10-Aug-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Add. Sr. Civil Judge and Acjm,merta

  50. 20-May-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 03-Mar-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 309/2017

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: 309/2017 The Judicial Magistrate of Medta acquitted accused Hanuman Ram of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) due to insufficient evidence. While the prosecution proved a fatal road accident occurred on 28.01.2017 involving a motorcycle (resulting in the victim Munaram's death), no witness testimony established that Hanuman Ram was operating the accused vehicle at the time of the collision. The court applied the benefit of doubt, finding the driver's identity unproven despite medical and mechanical evidence corroborating the accident's occurrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case