Smadar Singh vs Jagdish Singh Advocate - Sh. Mahendra Choudhary — 20/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 06th May 2026.

Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)

CNR: RJMR010003752025

Case disposed

Filing Number

89/2025

Filing Date

16-05-2025

Registration No

20/2025

Registration Date

16-05-2025

Court

DJ Merta District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge, Merta

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O39

Petitioner(s)

Smadar Singh

Adv. Sh. Ramvilas

Respondent(s)

Jagdish Singh Advocate - Sh. Mahendra Choudhary

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge, Merta

06-05-2026

Disposed

05-05-2026

Orders

02-05-2026

Orders

13-03-2026

Final arguments

12-02-2026

Final arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
judgement/order

Case Summary: 20/2025 Case: Smadar Singh v. Jagdish Singh Shekawat & Others Court: District Court, Merta, Rajasthan Date: 06-05-2026 The court rejected the petitioner's application under Order 39 Rules 1-2 read with Section 151 CPC seeking to restrain respondents from transferring certain properties and to preserve the status quo. The petitioner claimed he had given ₹27,00,000 to respondent-1 for investment purposes in 2022 at 2% monthly interest, with assurances of repayment, supported by written acknowledgments. The court found the petitioner failed to establish: (1) a prima facie case, as the written documents lacked proper evidentiary foundation and no conditional charge on properties was documented; (2) balance of convenience favoring the petitioner; and (3) irreparable injury. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as the petitioner could not prove the three essential grounds required for interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 20/2025 Case: Smadar Singh v. Jagdish Singh Shekawat & Others Court: District Court, Merta, Rajasthan Date: 06-05-2026 The court rejected the petitioner's application under Order 39 Rules 1-2 read with Section 151 CPC seeking to restrain respondents from transferring certain properties and to preserve the status quo. The petitioner claimed he had given ₹27,00,000 to respondent-1 for investment purposes in 2022 at 2% monthly interest, with assurances of repayment, supported by written acknowledgments. The court found the petitioner failed to establish: (1) a prima facie case, as the written documents lacked proper evidentiary foundation and no conditional charge on properties was documented; (2) balance of convenience favoring the petitioner; and (3) irreparable injury. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as the petitioner could not prove the three essential grounds required for interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Merta District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case