state vs Radheshyam — 12/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 233. Disposed: Contested--Allowed otherwise on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJMR010001942026

Filing Number

135/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Merta District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge, Merta

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed otherwise

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 233

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.state

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Radheshyam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    judgement/orderView PDF

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    judgement/orderView PDF

    Case 12/2026 Summary The court partially accepted Radheshyam's petition under Section 233 BNS in an NDPS drug possession case. The accused was charged with possessing 3.620 kg of opium seized from his motorcycle on 08.02.2026. The court directed the investigating officer to obtain and place on record the CDR (Call Detail Records) and tower location data of the seized mobile phone (7073462925) and CCTV footage from the police station for the relevant time period (3:30 PM to 10:00 PM on 08.02.2026) as electronic evidence in a sealed envelope, following the precedent in *Mangilal Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)* to ensure fair investigation and protect the accused's rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Restored

    District and Sessions Judge, Merta

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge, Merta

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 12/2026 Summary The court partially accepted Radheshyam's petition under Section 233 BNS in an NDPS drug possession case. The accused was charged with possessing 3.620 kg of opium seized from his motorcycle on 08.02.2026. The court directed the investigating officer to obtain and place on record the CDR (Call Detail Records) and tower location data of the seized mobile phone (7073462925) and CCTV footage from the police station for the relevant time period (3:30 PM to 10:00 PM on 08.02.2026) as electronic evidence in a sealed envelope, following the precedent in *Mangilal Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)* to ensure fair investigation and protect the accused's rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case