Mahipal etc vs state Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 70/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJMR010001932026
Filing Number
134/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
70/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DJ Merta District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge, Merta
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
paadukalaan
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahipal etc
Adv. Sh. Madhu Sudhan Joshi
Respondent(s)
state Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge, Merta
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Orders |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
| 13-03-2026 | Orders |
| 13-03-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted bail to petitioners Mahipal and Ramavtar in a criminal case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 352, and 324(6) (attempt to cause grievous hurt and criminal intimidation). The court found that while serious allegations existed, the medical report showed only minor injuries inconsistent with the severity of charges alleged, and one petitioner had no prior criminal history. Each petitioner was released on bail of ₹1,00,000 personal bond with two sureties of ₹50,000 each, conditional on regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted bail to petitioners Mahipal and Ramavtar in a criminal case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 352, and 324(6) (attempt to cause grievous hurt and criminal intimidation). The court found that while serious allegations existed, the medical report showed only minor injuries inconsistent with the severity of charges alleged, and one petitioner had no prior criminal history. Each petitioner was released on bail of ₹1,00,000 personal bond with two sureties of ₹50,000 each, conditional on regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts