Vijay Sansi etc vs state — 69/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJMR010001902026

Filing Number

132/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

69/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Merta District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge, Merta

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

Thanwla

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijay Sansi etc

    Adv. Sh. Jitendra Singh

  2. 2.Vasha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    judgement/orderView PDF

    Case Summary: 69/2026 The court granted bail to petitioners Vijay Sansi and Varsha, charged under Sections 8/21 of the NDPS Act for possession of 60 grams of smack (heroin). The court found that the quantity seized was below commercial threshold, no narcotics were recovered directly from the petitioners, and a co-accused had previously been granted bail by the same court on similar facts. Each petitioner was released on personal bonds of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of ₹50,000 each, subject to regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge, Merta

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 69/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 69/2026 The court granted bail to petitioners Vijay Sansi and Varsha, charged under Sections 8/21 of the NDPS Act for possession of 60 grams of smack (heroin). The court found that the quantity seized was below commercial threshold, no narcotics were recovered directly from the petitioners, and a co-accused had previously been granted bail by the same court on similar facts. Each petitioner was released on personal bonds of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of ₹50,000 each, subject to regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case