Dhanraj etc vs state — 68/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 19th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: RJMR010001812026

Case disposed

Filing Number

127/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

68/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

DJ Merta District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge, Merta

Decision Date

19th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

Merta Road

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Dhanraj etc

Adv. Sh. Suresh Choudhary

Respondent(s)

state

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge, Merta

19-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Orders

17-03-2026

Orders

16-03-2026

Orders

13-03-2026

Orders

Final Orders / Judgements

19-03-2026
judgement/order

Case Summary - 68/2026 The Medta Sessions Court granted bail to petitioners Dhanraj and Ramniwas in an NDPS Act case (FIR 21/2026) under Section 483 CrPC. While 160 grams of heroin was allegedly recovered from co-accused Bablu, no contraband was recovered from the petitioners themselves, and they were not arrested at the scene. The court relied on the Supreme Court's *Tufan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu* precedent, holding that accusations based solely on the main accused's disclosure statement cannot constitute reliable trial evidence without corroborating proof. With investigation completed and no prior convictions substantiated, the court found bail justified. Conditions: Each petitioner must furnish a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of ₹50,000 each, with regular court attendance required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - 68/2026 The Medta Sessions Court granted bail to petitioners Dhanraj and Ramniwas in an NDPS Act case (FIR 21/2026) under Section 483 CrPC. While 160 grams of heroin was allegedly recovered from co-accused Bablu, no contraband was recovered from the petitioners themselves, and they were not arrested at the scene. The court relied on the Supreme Court's *Tufan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu* precedent, holding that accusations based solely on the main accused's disclosure statement cannot constitute reliable trial evidence without corroborating proof. With investigation completed and no prior convictions substantiated, the court found bail justified. Conditions: Each petitioner must furnish a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of ₹50,000 each, with regular court attendance required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Merta District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case