Khalil vs state — 65/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJMR010001752026

Filing Number

123/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

65/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Merta District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge, Merta

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

Thanwla

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Khalil

    Adv. Sh. Iqbal Pathan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    judgement/orderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Court at Merta, Rajasthan granted bail to two accused, Mahendra and Khalil, in a theft case (FIR No. 32/2026) involving the alleged theft of a tractor and trolley. The court found that investigation was incomplete, no recovery was made from the accused prior to custody, and the stolen tractor had already been recovered; the court imposed conditions requiring each accused to furnish personal bonds of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each, with mandatory regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge, Merta

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 65/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Court at Merta, Rajasthan granted bail to two accused, Mahendra and Khalil, in a theft case (FIR No. 32/2026) involving the alleged theft of a tractor and trolley. The court found that investigation was incomplete, no recovery was made from the accused prior to custody, and the stolen tractor had already been recovered; the court imposed conditions requiring each accused to furnish personal bonds of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each, with mandatory regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case