Mahaveer vs State Advocate - APP SANGOD — 7/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Bail Cancelled on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJKT140002732026

Filing Number

271/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

7/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

ACJM Sangod Taluka

Judge

1-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangod

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Cancelled

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

BAPAWAR KALAN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahaveer

    Adv. BABULAL NAGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor) SANGOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Mahaveer v. State (FIR 40/2026) Mahaveer, aged 27, was arrested on March 14, 2026, for illegal possession of 48 bottles of Neembu Special liquor without authorization under the Rajasthan Excise Act (Section 19/54). The court found prima facie evidence of the offense and noted the accused's prior criminal record spanning seven pending cases involving similar excise violations and other offenses. The Chief Judicial Magistrate rejected Mahaveer's bail petition under Section 480 BNSS, finding that granting bail would be unjustified given the nature of the charges and his history of offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangod

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mahaveer v. State (FIR 40/2026) Mahaveer, aged 27, was arrested on March 14, 2026, for illegal possession of 48 bottles of Neembu Special liquor without authorization under the Rajasthan Excise Act (Section 19/54). The court found prima facie evidence of the offense and noted the accused's prior criminal record spanning seven pending cases involving similar excise violations and other offenses. The Chief Judicial Magistrate rejected Mahaveer's bail petition under Section 480 BNSS, finding that granting bail would be unjustified given the nature of the charges and his history of offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case