SALMAN vs State Advocate - ADPP — 76/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJKT100001742026

Filing Number

130/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

76/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ Ramganjmandi Taluka

Judge

1-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ramganjmandi

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

290

Police Station

SUKET

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SALMAN

    Adv. CHANDAN KUMAR GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - ADPP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Salman v. State (Case 76/2026) Court Decision: The court rejected Salman's second bail petition under Section 483 of the CrPC in an NDPS Act case. Key Reasoning: Salman was accused of unlawfully possessing 70 kilograms of cannabis (a commercial quantity) hidden in a residential property. The court found the charges serious, noted his prior criminal record (three pending cases), and determined that the large quantity of contraband satisfied the legal threshold against bail under NDPS provisions. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the court held that bail cannot be granted in drug trafficking cases unless the court is satisfied the accused is likely innocent—a condition not met here given the commercial quantity seized and gravity of offenses under NDPS Act Sections 8/20 and 8/29. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ramganjmandi

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Salman v. State (Case 76/2026) Court Decision: The court rejected Salman's second bail petition under Section 483 of the CrPC in an NDPS Act case. Key Reasoning: Salman was accused of unlawfully possessing 70 kilograms of cannabis (a commercial quantity) hidden in a residential property. The court found the charges serious, noted his prior criminal record (three pending cases), and determined that the large quantity of contraband satisfied the legal threshold against bail under NDPS provisions. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the court held that bail cannot be granted in drug trafficking cases unless the court is satisfied the accused is likely innocent—a condition not met here given the commercial quantity seized and gravity of offenses under NDPS Act Sections 8/20 and 8/29. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case