MUNTJEER URF GOLU vs STATE Advocate - PP DJ — 661/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJKT010015692026

Filing Number

1350/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

661/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Kota HQ

Judge

1-District and Session Judge

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

R K PURAM

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNTJEER URF GOLU

    Adv. HARISH SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) DJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 661/2026 Muntjeer Urf Golu v. State The Session Court, Kota granted bail to petitioner Muntjeer Urf Golu in this second bail application filed under CrPC Section 483. The petitioner was arrested in connection with an alleged armed robbery of a petrol pump, charged under IPC Sections 310(4), 310(5) and Arms Act Sections 3/25, 4/25, 5/25. The court found that investigation against the petitioner was substantially complete, no further custodial interrogation was required, and several co-accused had already been granted bail by courts or the High Court, making the petitioner's case distinct in nature. The court accordingly approved bail on personal bond of ₹40,000 with two sureties of ₹20,000 each, subject to conditions of regular court attendance and no commission of further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Session Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 661/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 661/2026 Muntjeer Urf Golu v. State The Session Court, Kota granted bail to petitioner Muntjeer Urf Golu in this second bail application filed under CrPC Section 483. The petitioner was arrested in connection with an alleged armed robbery of a petrol pump, charged under IPC Sections 310(4), 310(5) and Arms Act Sections 3/25, 4/25, 5/25. The court found that investigation against the petitioner was substantially complete, no further custodial interrogation was required, and several co-accused had already been granted bail by courts or the High Court, making the petitioner's case distinct in nature. The court accordingly approved bail on personal bond of ₹40,000 with two sureties of ₹20,000 each, subject to conditions of regular court attendance and no commission of further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case