SHIVSHANKAR ETC vs STATE Advocate - PP DJ — 658/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJKT010015592026

Filing Number

1341/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

658/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Kota HQ

Judge

1-District and Session Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

139

Police Station

CHECHAT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVSHANKAR ETC

    Adv. RAJENDRA KUMAR BAIRWA

  2. 2.BHUPENDRA

  3. 3.BAJRANG LAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) DJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 658/2026 Court: Session Court, Kota (Rajasthan) Date: 18.03.2026 The court granted bail to three accused persons (Shivshankkar, Bhupendra, and Bajrang Lal) charged under Sections 3/14 of the Child Labour Act and Sections 75, 79 of the Juvenile Justice Act. The accused had missed a court hearing on 11.02.2026, resulting in their bail being forfeited and arrest warrants issued on 09.02.2026. However, they subsequently surrendered before the court. The judge found their non-appearance to be a bona fide error and ruled that it was unjust to keep them in custody pending trial, which is still in preliminary stages. The court ordered their release on personal bond of ₹32,000 and two sureties of ₹15,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Session Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 658/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 658/2026 Court: Session Court, Kota (Rajasthan) Date: 18.03.2026 The court granted bail to three accused persons (Shivshankkar, Bhupendra, and Bajrang Lal) charged under Sections 3/14 of the Child Labour Act and Sections 75, 79 of the Juvenile Justice Act. The accused had missed a court hearing on 11.02.2026, resulting in their bail being forfeited and arrest warrants issued on 09.02.2026. However, they subsequently surrendered before the court. The judge found their non-appearance to be a bona fide error and ruled that it was unjust to keep them in custody pending trial, which is still in preliminary stages. The court ordered their release on personal bond of ₹32,000 and two sureties of ₹15,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case