BITTU vs STATE Advocate - PP DJ — 649/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJKT010015492026

Filing Number

1334/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

649/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Kota HQ

Judge

1-District and Session Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

90

Police Station

ANANTPURA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BITTU

    Adv. AMAR SINGH NARUKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) DJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case 649/2026 (BITTU v. STATE) Decision: The Session Court rejected petitioner Bittu's bail application under CrPC Section 483. The court found that Bittu, along with two juvenile accomplices, attacked the complainant Rahul with sharp weapons (knives/chakras) on 08.03.2026, causing three serious injuries including a deep wound to the head. The injuries were inflicted with weapons and the attack was allegedly motivated by prior enmity. Given the gravity of charges under IPC Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 324(2), 118(1), and 3(5), the court deemed bail inappropriate at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Session Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 649/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 649/2026 (BITTU v. STATE) Decision: The Session Court rejected petitioner Bittu's bail application under CrPC Section 483. The court found that Bittu, along with two juvenile accomplices, attacked the complainant Rahul with sharp weapons (knives/chakras) on 08.03.2026, causing three serious injuries including a deep wound to the head. The injuries were inflicted with weapons and the attack was allegedly motivated by prior enmity. Given the gravity of charges under IPC Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 324(2), 118(1), and 3(5), the court deemed bail inappropriate at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case