BANWARILAL ETC vs STATE Advocate - PP DJ — 650/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJKT010015382026

Filing Number

1327/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

650/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Kota HQ

Judge

1-District and Session Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

KAITHOON

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BANWARILAL ETC

    Adv. DEENANATH GALAV

  2. 2.VISHNU KUMAR SEN

  3. 3.KRISHNAWTAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) DJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 650/2026 Court Decision: The Session Judge of Kota (Rajasthan) granted bail to the three accused—Banwarilal, Vishnu Kumar, and Krishnawtar—under Section 483 of the CrPC, on the condition of personal bond of Rs 40,000 and two sureties of Rs 20,000 each with identity proof. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the accused are charged under IPC Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 110, and 189(2) for allegedly beating the complainant Anil Kumawat, the injuries sustained (bruises on forehead, thigh, and limbs) were minor and non-grievous. The incident arose from a civil dispute over opening a gate. Given the investigation status, absence of serious injury, and no flight risk, the court determined bail was appropriate without prejudicing the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Session Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 650/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 650/2026 Court Decision: The Session Judge of Kota (Rajasthan) granted bail to the three accused—Banwarilal, Vishnu Kumar, and Krishnawtar—under Section 483 of the CrPC, on the condition of personal bond of Rs 40,000 and two sureties of Rs 20,000 each with identity proof. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the accused are charged under IPC Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 110, and 189(2) for allegedly beating the complainant Anil Kumawat, the injuries sustained (bruises on forehead, thigh, and limbs) were minor and non-grievous. The incident arose from a civil dispute over opening a gate. Given the investigation status, absence of serious injury, and no flight risk, the court determined bail was appropriate without prejudicing the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case