BALBEER SINGH vs State Advocate - Add PP — 87/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Disposed: Contested--Appeal dismissed, Cross Objection Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
Cr. Appeal
CNR: RJKA050011092018
Filing Number
229/2018
Filing Date
01-Dec-2018
Registration No
87/2018
Registration Date
01-Dec-2018
Court
ADJ Kishangarh Bas HQ
Judge
23-A.d.j.no.1,
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Appeal dismissed, Cross Objection Allowed
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALBEER SINGH
Adv. GIRDHAR LAL SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Advocate - Add PP (Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Balbeer Singh v. State of Rajasthan (CIS 87/2018) The appellate court partially allowed Balbeer Singh's appeal against his conviction for theft (IPC §457, 380) stemming from a 2008 industrial store burglary in Khairthal. While affirming the conviction on merit based on sufficient eyewitness testimony and recovery of stolen materials, the court significantly reduced the sentence. The court credited Singh with 19 days of pre-trial custody and judicial detention spanning 18 years since the original 2008 crime, finding the prolonged delay unjust. The original sentence (2 years + ₹1,000 fine for §457; 1 year + ₹500 for §380) was modified to time-served plus ₹5,000 fine for each offense, accounting for the extended judicial custody period suffered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
A.d.j.no.1,
-
18-Mar-2026
Final arguments
A.d.j.no.1,
-
06-Mar-2026
Final arguments
A.d.j.no.1,
-
04-Mar-2026
Final arguments
A.d.j.no.1,
-
25-Feb-2026
Final arguments
A.d.j.no.1,
-
11-Feb-2026
Final arguments
A.d.j.no.1,
-
07-Jan-2026
Final arguments
A.d.j.no.1,
-
03-Dec-2025
Final arguments
-
12-Nov-2025
Final arguments
-
03-Nov-2025
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
17-Oct-2025
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
26-Sep-2025
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
10-Sep-2025
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
20-Aug-2025
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
30-Jul-2025
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
23-Jul-2025
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
04-Jun-2025
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
26-Mar-2025
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
12-Feb-2025
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
23-Oct-2024
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
24-Jul-2024
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
12-Jun-2024
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
20-Mar-2024
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
17-Jan-2024
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
08-Nov-2023
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
06-Sep-2023
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
14-Jun-2023
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
03-May-2023
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
01-Mar-2023
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
04-Jan-2023
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
09-Nov-2022
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
31-Aug-2022
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
22-Jun-2022
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
13-Apr-2022
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
23-Feb-2022
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
22-Dec-2021
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
06-Oct-2021
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
19-Jul-2021
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
09-Jun-2021
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
07-Apr-2021
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
10-Feb-2021
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
16-Dec-2020
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
28-Oct-2020
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
02-Sep-2020
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
08-Jul-2020
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
17-Jun-2020
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
27-May-2020
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
06-May-2020
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
15-Apr-2020
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
01-Apr-2020
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
12-Feb-2020
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
18-Dec-2019
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
23-Oct-2019
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
21-Aug-2019
Final arguments
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
19-Jun-2019
Awaiting records
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
01-May-2019
Awaiting records
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
27-Mar-2019
Awaiting records
Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
-
02-Feb-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 87/2018
Case Summary: Balbeer Singh v. State of Rajasthan (CIS 87/2018) The appellate court partially allowed Balbeer Singh's appeal against his conviction for theft (IPC §457, 380) stemming from a 2008 industrial store burglary in Khairthal. While affirming the conviction on merit based on sufficient eyewitness testimony and recovery of stolen materials, the court significantly reduced the sentence. The court credited Singh with 19 days of pre-trial custody and judicial detention spanning 18 years since the original 2008 crime, finding the prolonged delay unjust. The original sentence (2 years + ₹1,000 fine for §457; 1 year + ₹500 for §380) was modified to time-served plus ₹5,000 fine for each offense, accounting for the extended judicial custody period suffered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts