State vs sarjeet Advocate - NIL — 5/2025
Case under Arms Act Section 5/27, 3/25. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 19th May 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJKA010000812025
Filing Number
45/2025
Filing Date
28-Nov-2025
Registration No
5/2025
Registration Date
28-Nov-2025
Court
DJ ADJ Khairthal District HQ
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
17
Police Station
KHARIRTHAL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. RAMJAS YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.sarjeet Advocate - NIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Judgment
Case Summary: State v. Sarjeet (Session Case 11/2025) Court Decision: The District and Sessions Judge, Kherapal, acquitted accused Sarjeet Singh (age 50) of all charges under IPC Sections 109(1), 352, 351(2) and Arms Act Sections 3/25, 5/27 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused fired a weapon at the complainant's family on December 26, 2024, as critical forensic evidence contradicted the charges, and eyewitnesses declared hostile by prosecution contradicted the allegations. Key Reasoning: Multiple witnesses (including the complainant) testified that no altercation or firing occurred. Forensic reports (FSL and armorer) confirmed the seized firearm was non-functional. The seized weapon was presented to court only seven months after the alleged incident, and custody documentation lacked proper dates, creating doubts about evidence integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
18-May-2026
Final arguments
District Judge
-
07-May-2026
Final arguments
District Judge
-
06-May-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
05-May-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
28-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
27-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
-
05-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
-
19-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2025
Case Summary: State v. Sarjeet (Session Case 11/2025) Court Decision: The District and Sessions Judge, Kherapal, acquitted accused Sarjeet Singh (age 50) of all charges under IPC Sections 109(1), 352, 351(2) and Arms Act Sections 3/25, 5/27 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused fired a weapon at the complainant's family on December 26, 2024, as critical forensic evidence contradicted the charges, and eyewitnesses declared hostile by prosecution contradicted the allegations. Key Reasoning: Multiple witnesses (including the complainant) testified that no altercation or firing occurred. Forensic reports (FSL and armorer) confirmed the seized firearm was non-functional. The seized weapon was presented to court only seven months after the alleged incident, and custody documentation lacked proper dates, creating doubts about evidence integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts