State vs Nathu Lal etc Advocate - Vinod Kumar Sharma — 172/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,323,341,504,447,427. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 07th May 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJW130003262021
Filing Number
326/2021
Filing Date
24-03-2021
Registration No
172/2021
Registration Date
24-03-2021
Court
JM Pirawa Jhalawar District
Judge
11-CJ and JM
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
FIR Details
FIR Number
4
Police Station
Raipur
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Nathu Lal etc Advocate - Vinod Kumar Sharma
Rang Lal
Durga lal
Puri Lal
Prakash
Devi lal
Lal chand
Gordhan
Hearing History
Judge: 11-CJ and JM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 22-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate, Pidawa (Rajasthan) convicted eight accused persons under IPC Sections 143, 323, 341, 504, 447, and 427 for unlawfully entering the complainant's plot on August 2, 2020, assaulting him and his son, abusing them verbally, and damaging property worth Rs. 2,450. The court found the prosecution's oral and documentary evidence sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and sentenced each accused to probation with a bond of Rs. 10,000 for two years instead of imprisonment, citing their lack of prior criminal records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate, Pidawa (Rajasthan) convicted eight accused persons under IPC Sections 143, 323, 341, 504, 447, and 427 for unlawfully entering the complainant's plot on August 2, 2020, assaulting him and his son, abusing them verbally, and damaging property worth Rs. 2,450. The court found the prosecution's oral and documentary evidence sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and sentenced each accused to probation with a bond of Rs. 10,000 for two years instead of imprisonment, citing their lack of prior criminal records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts