Procesuction vs Tulsiram Advocate - Kiran Verma — 494/2017
Case under Arms Act Section 4,25. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 10th April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJW110010862017
Filing Number
1086/2017
Filing Date
07-Jul-2017
Registration No
494/2017
Registration Date
07-Jul-2017
Court
JM Khanpur Jhalawar District
Judge
11-Cj and Jm
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
401
Police Station
KHANPUR
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Procesuction
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tulsiram Advocate - Kiran Verma
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Judgement
Summary of Case 494/2017 Court Decision: The Civil Judge convicted defendant Tulsiram under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act for illegally possessing a 58cm iron sword (exceeding the 10.16cm legal limit without authorization) on November 20, 2016. However, the court granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act rather than imprisonment, imposing a ₹10,000 bond with personal recognizance for one year. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's evidence—testimony from five witnesses including the arresting ASI and constables, the seized weapon, and forensic documentation—credible and sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting the defense's argument that only police witnesses testified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Cj and Jm
-
23-Mar-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Cj and Jm
-
09-Mar-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Cj and Jm
-
16-Feb-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Cj and Jm
-
27-Jan-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Cj and Jm
-
09-Dec-2025
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Cj and Jm
-
25-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
11-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
28-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
14-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
07-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
24-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
18-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
04-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
21-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
07-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
24-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
10-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
27-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
13-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
30-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
16-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
05-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
21-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
07-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Cj and Jm
-
24-Mar-2025
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
20-Jan-2025
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
20-Sep-2024
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
25-Jun-2024
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
26-Mar-2024
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
16-Nov-2023
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
06-Jun-2023
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
04-Feb-2023
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
12-Aug-2022
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
08-Apr-2022
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
26-Nov-2021
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
17-Jul-2021
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
23-Apr-2021
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
17-Dec-2020
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
12-Oct-2020
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
03-Jul-2020
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
03-Apr-2020
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
12-Feb-2020
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
30-Oct-2019
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
25-Jul-2019
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
03-Apr-2019
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
11-Dec-2018
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
20-Jun-2018
Appearance of accused
Cj and Jm
-
01-Dec-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jul-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 494/2017
Summary of Case 494/2017 Court Decision: The Civil Judge convicted defendant Tulsiram under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act for illegally possessing a 58cm iron sword (exceeding the 10.16cm legal limit without authorization) on November 20, 2016. However, the court granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act rather than imprisonment, imposing a ₹10,000 bond with personal recognizance for one year. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's evidence—testimony from five witnesses including the arresting ASI and constables, the seized weapon, and forensic documentation—credible and sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting the defense's argument that only police witnesses testified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts