STATE vs Mukesh Advocate - Raghunandan Singh — 1112/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Regular

CNR: RJJW110008152016

Filing Number

1883/2016

Filing Date

19-Oct-2016

Registration No

1112/2016

Registration Date

19-Oct-2016

Court

JM Khanpur Jhalawar District

Judge

11-Cj and Jm

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

187

Police Station

SAROLA

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mukesh Advocate - Raghunandan Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Jhalawar District Court (March 11, 2026) acquitted Mukesh, accused of outraging a woman's modesty under IPC Section 354(k), finding contradictions in the complainant's testimony. The court noted discrepancies between the FIR (filed 5 months after the alleged incident on March 27, 2016), written statements, and court deposition, including conflicting accounts from her mother. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistent witness evidence and lack of corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cj and Jm

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Cj and Jm

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Cj and Jm

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Cj and Jm

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  10. 06-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  11. 20-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  12. 04-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  13. 31-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  14. 22-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  15. 04-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  16. 16-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  17. 03-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  18. 05-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  19. 28-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  20. 27-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  21. 29-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  22. 03-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  23. 20-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  24. 31-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  25. 01-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  26. 11-Jan-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  27. 03-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  28. 13-Jan-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  29. 17-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  30. 22-Jan-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  31. 11-Jun-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  32. 24-Aug-2017

    Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  33. 26-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 19-Oct-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1112/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Jhalawar District Court (March 11, 2026) acquitted Mukesh, accused of outraging a woman's modesty under IPC Section 354(k), finding contradictions in the complainant's testimony. The court noted discrepancies between the FIR (filed 5 months after the alleged incident on March 27, 2016), written statements, and court deposition, including conflicting accounts from her mother. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistent witness evidence and lack of corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case