State vs Chotulal Etc. Advocate - Lakshman Rathor — 218/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,458,427,504,34. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Regular

CNR: RJJW110001912015

Filing Number

293/2015

Filing Date

10-Jun-2015

Registration No

218/2015

Registration Date

10-Jun-2015

Court

JM Khanpur Jhalawar District

Judge

11-Cj and Jm

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

SAROLA

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,458,427,504,34
Arms Act Section 4/25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chotulal Etc. Advocate - Lakshman Rathor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Summary of Case 218/2015 Court Decision: The court convicted the two surviving accused (Seema Bai and Dargu Shankar) of assault, criminal intimidation, and causing hurt under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, and 504, while acquitting them on charges of house-breaking (Section 458) and mischief (Section 427) due to insufficient evidence. The accused were sentenced to probation under the Probation of Offenders Act with a bond amount of ₹10,000 each and directed to pay ₹3,000 in prosecution costs. The third accused (Chotulal) died during trial, and proceedings against him were dropped on August 13, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cj and Jm

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Cj and Jm

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Cj and Jm

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Cj and Jm

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Cj and Jm

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Cj and Jm

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  10. 16-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  12. 06-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  13. 17-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  14. 03-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  15. 20-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  17. 28-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  18. 13-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  19. 02-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  20. 25-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  21. 19-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  22. 15-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  23. 01-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  24. 30-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  25. 07-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  26. 20-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  27. 26-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  28. 20-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  29. 21-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  30. 14-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  31. 16-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  32. 11-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  33. 16-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  34. 29-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  35. 07-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  36. 23-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  37. 04-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  38. 04-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  39. 27-Jan-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  40. 23-Nov-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  41. 22-Sep-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  42. 23-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  43. 07-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  44. 18-Jun-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  45. 09-Apr-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  46. 27-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  47. 23-Oct-2017

    Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  48. 28-Jan-2017

    Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  49. 07-Sep-2016

    Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  50. 21-Jan-2016

    Charge

    Cj and Jm

  51. 16-Oct-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 10-Jun-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 218/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 218/2015 Court Decision: The court convicted the two surviving accused (Seema Bai and Dargu Shankar) of assault, criminal intimidation, and causing hurt under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, and 504, while acquitting them on charges of house-breaking (Section 458) and mischief (Section 427) due to insufficient evidence. The accused were sentenced to probation under the Probation of Offenders Act with a bond amount of ₹10,000 each and directed to pay ₹3,000 in prosecution costs. The third accused (Chotulal) died during trial, and proceedings against him were dropped on August 13, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case