State (APP) vs Monu Kahar — 858/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,125(a). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJW080018202025

Filing Number

1820/2025

Filing Date

27-Aug-2025

Registration No

858/2025

Registration Date

27-Aug-2025

Court

ACJM JM Aklera Jhalawar District

Judge

22-Scj and Acjm

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

351

Police Station

Aklera

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,125(a)
Motor Vehicles Act Section 3/181

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State (APP)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Monu Kahar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Akela, Jhalawar acquitted the accused Monu under IPC Sections 281 and 125(A) and Motor Vehicles Act Section 3/181, finding insufficient evidence to prove he was operating the motorcycle involved in the June 22, 2025 hit-and-run accident. The prosecution failed to establish the identity of the motorcycle rider or definitively link the accused to the vehicle through witness testimony, as no witness identified the accused as the driver. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Scj and Acjm

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Scj and Acjm

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Scj and Acjm

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Scj and Acjm

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Scj and Acjm

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Scj and Acjm

  9. 24-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Scj and Acjm

  10. 24-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Scj and Acjm

  11. 27-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 27-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 858/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Akela, Jhalawar acquitted the accused Monu under IPC Sections 281 and 125(A) and Motor Vehicles Act Section 3/181, finding insufficient evidence to prove he was operating the motorcycle involved in the June 22, 2025 hit-and-run accident. The prosecution failed to establish the identity of the motorcycle rider or definitively link the accused to the vehicle through witness testimony, as no witness identified the accused as the driver. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case