Govt. vs Motilal etc. — 303/2023
Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act Section 05,06,08. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJW080004852023
Filing Number
485/2023
Filing Date
12-04-2023
Registration No
303/2023
Registration Date
12-04-2023
Court
ACJM JM Aklera Jhalawar District
Judge
22-SCJ and ACJM
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
207
Police Station
Aklera
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt.
Adv. po
Respondent(s)
Motilal etc.
Hearing History
Judge: 22-SCJ and ACJM
Disposed
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Framing of Charge/ Plea
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Framing of Charge/ Plea |
| 12-03-2026 | Framing of Charge/ Plea |
| 09-03-2026 | Framing of Charge/ Plea |
| 07-03-2026 | Framing of Charge/ Plea |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case: FIR No. 303/2023, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akley, Jhalawar District, Rajasthan Court's Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Motilal, Chandrasingh, and Mukesh) under Sections 5, 6, 8 of the Rajasthan Gauvansh Adhiniyam 1995 and Section 146/196 IPC. The prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence that the accused transported calves without proper authorization or vehicle insurance, as no independent witnesses corroborated the charges and witness testimony contradicted the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: FIR No. 303/2023, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akley, Jhalawar District, Rajasthan Court's Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Motilal, Chandrasingh, and Mukesh) under Sections 5, 6, 8 of the Rajasthan Gauvansh Adhiniyam 1995 and Section 146/196 IPC. The prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence that the accused transported calves without proper authorization or vehicle insurance, as no independent witnesses corroborated the charges and witness testimony contradicted the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts