Procecution vs Kalu Rajak — 201/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,327. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJW080004092018

Filing Number

409/2018

Filing Date

06-Mar-2018

Registration No

201/2018

Registration Date

06-Mar-2018

Court

ACJM JM Aklera Jhalawar District

Judge

33-Cj and Jm

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,327

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Procecution

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kalu Rajak

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 201/2018 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Kalu Rajak of charges under IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (insult intending breach of peace), and 327 (causing hurt by dangerous weapon). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as key prosecution witnesses (PW3, PW4, PW5) testified that they did not witness the alleged assault and extortion of ₹500 from complainant Anwar Husain, contradicting the complainant's account and creating reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    Cj and Jm

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Cj and Jm

  5. 25-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Cj and Jm

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Cj and Jm

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Service of Non-bailable warrant

    Cj and Jm

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Cj and Jm

  9. 14-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  11. 01-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  13. 05-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  14. 24-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  15. 19-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  16. 05-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  17. 24-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  18. 29-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  19. 06-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  20. 04-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  21. 10-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  22. 06-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  23. 26-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  24. 20-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  25. 20-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  26. 27-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  27. 18-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  28. 09-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  29. 22-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  30. 13-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  31. 09-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  32. 27-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  33. 25-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  34. 24-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  35. 06-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj and Jm

  36. 24-Jan-2022

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  37. 04-Oct-2021

    Orders

    Scj and Acjm

  38. 13-Aug-2021

    Orders

    Scj and Acjm

  39. 15-Apr-2021

    Orders

  40. 04-Jan-2021

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  41. 21-Sep-2020

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  42. 17-Jul-2020

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  43. 09-Jun-2020

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  44. 18-Apr-2020

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  45. 04-Jan-2020

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  46. 19-Oct-2019

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  47. 13-Jun-2019

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  48. 05-Feb-2019

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  49. 12-Oct-2018

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  50. 11-Jul-2018

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  51. 24-Apr-2018

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  52. 12-Apr-2018

    Orders

  53. 30-Mar-2018

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  54. 20-Mar-2018

    Orders

    Cj and Jm

  55. 06-Mar-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 06-Mar-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 201/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 201/2018 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Kalu Rajak of charges under IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (insult intending breach of peace), and 327 (causing hurt by dangerous weapon). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as key prosecution witnesses (PW3, PW4, PW5) testified that they did not witness the alleged assault and extortion of ₹500 from complainant Anwar Husain, contradicting the complainant's account and creating reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case