Procecution vs Premnarayan @ Premchand etc. Advocate - MOHAN LAL VIJAY — 81/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,341,323,326,504,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 11th May 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJJW070006212019
Filing Number
387/2019
Filing Date
15-10-2019
Registration No
81/2019
Registration Date
15-10-2019
Court
ADJ Aklera Jhalawar District
Judge
11-ADJ
Decision Date
11th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
100
Police Station
Aklera
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Procecution
Adv. ADP
Respondent(s)
Premnarayan @ Premchand etc. Advocate - MOHAN LAL VIJAY
Harakchand @ Harishchand
Hearing History
Judge: 11-ADJ
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 21-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 13-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Session Case 81/2019 Court Decision: Both accused, Premnarayan @ Premchand and Harakchand @ Harishchand, were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 326 (causing grievous hurt), 307 (attempt to cause death), and 504 (criminal intimidation). Key Reasoning: The court found reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case due to contradictory witness testimonies, inconsistencies between the FIR and court statements, delayed medical examination (10 days after incident), and absence of corroborating forensic evidence. While the victim claimed axe injuries from the accused, key eyewitnesses gave conflicting accounts about who inflicted which injuries, and no blood was found on the recovered axe despite allegations of its use in the attack. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Session Case 81/2019 Court Decision: Both accused, Premnarayan @ Premchand and Harakchand @ Harishchand, were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 326 (causing grievous hurt), 307 (attempt to cause death), and 504 (criminal intimidation). Key Reasoning: The court found reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case due to contradictory witness testimonies, inconsistencies between the FIR and court statements, delayed medical examination (10 days after incident), and absence of corroborating forensic evidence. While the victim claimed axe injuries from the accused, key eyewitnesses gave conflicting accounts about who inflicted which injuries, and no blood was found on the recovered axe despite allegations of its use in the attack. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts