Bhuralal etc. vs State Advocate - Ad. PP — 6/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,341,323,326. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 11th March 2026.

Cr. Appeal

CNR: RJJW070005072024

Case disposed

Filing Number

388/2024

Filing Date

18-07-2024

Registration No

6/2024

Registration Date

18-07-2024

Court

ADJ Aklera Jhalawar District

Judge

11-ADJ

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

FIR Details

FIR Number

163

Police Station

Manohar Thana

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,341,323,326
Arms Act Section 4/25

Petitioner(s)

Bhuralal etc.

Adv. MOHAN LAL VIJAY

Chhitarlal

Adv. MOHAN LAL VIJAY

Kalyan

Adv. MOHAN LAL VIJAY

Ramdayal

Adv. MOHAN LAL VIJAY

Rajkumar

Adv. MOHAN LAL VIJAY

Beeramchand

Adv. MOHAN LAL VIJAY

Respondent(s)

State Advocate - Ad. PP (Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 11-ADJ

11-03-2026

Disposed

25-02-2026

Judgment

27-01-2026

Final arguments

06-12-2025

Final arguments

01-11-2025

Final arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Judgement

Summary The Rajasthan High Court (Sessions Division, Akola, Jhalawad District) partially allowed the criminal appeal filed by six accused persons. The court upheld their convictions under IPC Sections 143, 341, and 323 (rioting, wrongful restraint, and voluntarily causing hurt) but acquitted them of charges under Section 326 (causing grievous hurt), finding insufficient evidence that the serious finger injury to the complainant was caused by any specific accused. The court noted contradictions in witness testimonies regarding whether a sword caused the injury and granted the accused probation with bail conditions instead of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajasthan High Court (Sessions Division, Akola, Jhalawad District) partially allowed the criminal appeal filed by six accused persons. The court upheld their convictions under IPC Sections 143, 341, and 323 (rioting, wrongful restraint, and voluntarily causing hurt) but acquitted them of charges under Section 326 (causing grievous hurt), finding insufficient evidence that the serious finger injury to the complainant was caused by any specific accused. The court noted contradictions in witness testimonies regarding whether a sword caused the injury and granted the accused probation with bail conditions instead of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADJ Aklera Jhalawar District All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case