Bhuralal etc. vs State Advocate - Ad. PP — 6/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,341,323,326. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 11th March 2026.
Cr. Appeal
CNR: RJJW070005072024
Filing Number
388/2024
Filing Date
18-07-2024
Registration No
6/2024
Registration Date
18-07-2024
Court
ADJ Aklera Jhalawar District
Judge
11-ADJ
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
FIR Details
FIR Number
163
Police Station
Manohar Thana
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhuralal etc.
Adv. MOHAN LAL VIJAY
Chhitarlal
Adv. MOHAN LAL VIJAY
Kalyan
Adv. MOHAN LAL VIJAY
Ramdayal
Adv. MOHAN LAL VIJAY
Rajkumar
Adv. MOHAN LAL VIJAY
Beeramchand
Adv. MOHAN LAL VIJAY
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - Ad. PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 11-ADJ
Disposed
Judgment
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | Judgment |
| 27-01-2026 | Final arguments |
| 06-12-2025 | Final arguments |
| 01-11-2025 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Rajasthan High Court (Sessions Division, Akola, Jhalawad District) partially allowed the criminal appeal filed by six accused persons. The court upheld their convictions under IPC Sections 143, 341, and 323 (rioting, wrongful restraint, and voluntarily causing hurt) but acquitted them of charges under Section 326 (causing grievous hurt), finding insufficient evidence that the serious finger injury to the complainant was caused by any specific accused. The court noted contradictions in witness testimonies regarding whether a sword caused the injury and granted the accused probation with bail conditions instead of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Rajasthan High Court (Sessions Division, Akola, Jhalawad District) partially allowed the criminal appeal filed by six accused persons. The court upheld their convictions under IPC Sections 143, 341, and 323 (rioting, wrongful restraint, and voluntarily causing hurt) but acquitted them of charges under Section 326 (causing grievous hurt), finding insufficient evidence that the serious finger injury to the complainant was caused by any specific accused. The court noted contradictions in witness testimonies regarding whether a sword caused the injury and granted the accused probation with bail conditions instead of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts