Prabhulal etc. vs Beeram etc. Advocate - BHOJRAJ PARETA — 60/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 13th March 2026.
MACT Main - MACP
CNR: RJJW070004552020
Filing Number
132/2020
Filing Date
24-11-2020
Registration No
60/2020
Registration Date
24-11-2020
Court
ADJ Aklera Jhalawar District
Judge
11-ADJ
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prabhulal etc.
Adv. DURGA SHANKAR GOYAL
Rodibai
Respondent(s)
Beeram etc. Advocate - BHOJRAJ PARETA
MS Chola Mandlam Finc.
Hearing History
Judge: 11-ADJ
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-02-2026 | Final arguments |
| 30-01-2026 | Final arguments |
| 18-12-2025 | Final arguments |
| 25-11-2025 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 60/2020 Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aklehra, Jhalawar awarded compensation of ₹9,94,520 to petitioners Prabhulal and Rodibai (parents of deceased Parmanand) against respondents Biram (tractor driver) and MS Chola Mandlam Finance (insurance company). The tribunal found the tractor driver negligent in causing the fatal accident on May 15, 2020, when the tractor struck the deceased while he was returning from relieving himself on the roadside, rejecting the insurance company's defense that the deceased was an unauthorized passenger. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 60/2020 Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aklehra, Jhalawar awarded compensation of ₹9,94,520 to petitioners Prabhulal and Rodibai (parents of deceased Parmanand) against respondents Biram (tractor driver) and MS Chola Mandlam Finance (insurance company). The tribunal found the tractor driver negligent in causing the fatal accident on May 15, 2020, when the tractor struck the deceased while he was returning from relieving himself on the roadside, rejecting the insurance company's defense that the deceased was an unauthorized passenger. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts