Subhankha etc. vs Yashwant etc. — 16/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,399. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 17th April 2026.
Cr. Revision
CNR: RJJW070004432024
Filing Number
347/2024
Filing Date
01-07-2024
Registration No
16/2024
Registration Date
01-07-2024
Court
ADJ Aklera Jhalawar District
Judge
11-ADJ
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subhankha etc.
Adv. BHAG CHAND MEENA
Naseem
Respondent(s)
Yashwant etc.
State
Adv. Ad. PP
Hearing History
Judge: 11-ADJ
Disposed
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
| 07-04-2026 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
| 11-03-2026 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
| 19-02-2026 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The High Court of Rajasthan set aside the lower court's order (dated 17.02.2024) that had taken cognizance against Subhman Khan and Naseem under IPC Sections 420, 406, and 120-B in a criminal revision petition. The court found that the trial court failed to properly examine critical facts regarding the partnership agreement for a petrol pump and incorrectly took cognizance without adequately considering the investigation report and legal requirements under CrPC Section 202, thereby rendering the order unlawful and unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The High Court of Rajasthan set aside the lower court's order (dated 17.02.2024) that had taken cognizance against Subhman Khan and Naseem under IPC Sections 420, 406, and 120-B in a criminal revision petition. The court found that the trial court failed to properly examine critical facts regarding the partnership agreement for a petrol pump and incorrectly took cognizance without adequately considering the investigation report and legal requirements under CrPC Section 202, thereby rendering the order unlawful and unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts