Chamma bai etc vs Jansamany etc Advocate - BHUPENDRA KUMAR VERMA — 19/2025
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 24th March 2026.
Civil Misc. Non connected (38) - CIVIL MISC (NC)
CNR: RJJW070001932025
Filing Number
55/2025
Filing Date
11-03-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
11-03-2025
Court
ADJ Aklera Jhalawar District
Judge
11-ADJ
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chamma bai etc
Adv. YOGESH KUMAR GOYAL
Rahul
Rohit
manisha bai
Priyanka
Respondent(s)
Jansamany etc Advocate - BHUPENDRA KUMAR VERMA
Hearing History
Judge: 11-ADJ
Final arguments
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 10-02-2026 | Final arguments |
| 20-12-2025 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional District Judge of Aklaera, Jhalawaad (Rajasthan) granted the petition filed by Chhamma Bai (wife) and four children of deceased Kalulal under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The court ruled that Chhamma Bai is entitled to obtain a succession certificate for six life insurance policies totaling ₹7,77,505 belonging to her late husband Kalulal, as she is the legal heir and the policies designated her as nominee despite a discrepancy in her home name registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional District Judge of Aklaera, Jhalawaad (Rajasthan) granted the petition filed by Chhamma Bai (wife) and four children of deceased Kalulal under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The court ruled that Chhamma Bai is entitled to obtain a succession certificate for six life insurance policies totaling ₹7,77,505 belonging to her late husband Kalulal, as she is the legal heir and the policies designated her as nominee despite a discrepancy in her home name registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts