Kalulal vs State — 4/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section crappeal. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Appeal

CNR: RJJW070000742026

Filing Number

59/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

ADJ Aklera Jhalawar District

Judge

11-ADJ

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section crappeal

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kalulal

    Adv. YOGENDRA KUMAR SONI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Case Summary: Kalulal v. State (Criminal Appeal 4/2026) The Rajasthan High Court (Akhlera, Jhalawad District) allowed Kalulal's criminal appeal and set aside his conviction under Section 229-A IPC for criminal breach of bail conditions. The trial court had convicted him and imposed a ₹500 fine on 20 August 2025. However, the appellate court found that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, Section 12 provisions before sentencing and provided no reasoning for rejecting probation benefits. The court noted Kalulal had been acquitted in three prior related cases and submitted an affidavit claiming no prior convictions, which went unchallenged. Finding the conviction procedurally defective, the court acquitted him and directed that probation benefits be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    ADJ

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    ADJ

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Kalulal v. State (Criminal Appeal 4/2026) The Rajasthan High Court (Akhlera, Jhalawad District) allowed Kalulal's criminal appeal and set aside his conviction under Section 229-A IPC for criminal breach of bail conditions. The trial court had convicted him and imposed a ₹500 fine on 20 August 2025. However, the appellate court found that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, Section 12 provisions before sentencing and provided no reasoning for rejecting probation benefits. The court noted Kalulal had been acquitted in three prior related cases and submitted an affidavit claiming no prior convictions, which went unchallenged. Finding the conviction procedurally defective, the court acquitted him and directed that probation benefits be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case