Procecution vs Murli Advocate - DURGA SHANKAR GOYAL — 4/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 450,376. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJJW070000162020

Filing Number

4/2020

Filing Date

06-Jan-2020

Registration No

4/2020

Registration Date

06-Jan-2020

Court

ADJ Aklera Jhalawar District

Judge

11-ADJ

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

146

Police Station

Manohar Thana

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 450,376

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Procecution

    Adv. ADP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Murli Advocate - DURGA SHANKAR GOYAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary of Case 4/2020 Court Decision: The Additional Session Judge acquitted accused Murli (son of Gangaram) of charges under IPC Sections 456 (house-breaking) and 376 (rape) on May 12, 2026, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court identified critical investigative gaps including: the First Information Report filed six days after the alleged April 8, 2019 incident without explanation; contradictory witness statements regarding when the victim reported the crime; failure to examine key witnesses present at the crime scene (victim's 6-year-old daughter and 12-year-old sister-in-law); medical examination showing no physical corroboration of rape; and conflicting testimonies about the victim's clothing damage. The court also noted an underlying land dispute between the accused's family and the victim's family, suggesting possible motive for a false complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 08-May-2026

    Judgment

    ADJ

  5. 25-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    ADJ

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  10. 12-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  12. 31-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  13. 18-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  14. 18-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  15. 04-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  16. 30-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  17. 24-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  18. 20-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  19. 06-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  20. 14-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  21. 07-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  22. 18-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  23. 07-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  24. 01-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  25. 06-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  26. 17-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  27. 08-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  28. 30-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  29. 16-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  30. 28-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  31. 02-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  32. 14-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  33. 04-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  34. 16-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  35. 21-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  36. 03-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  37. 16-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  38. 28-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  39. 08-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  40. 12-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  41. 25-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  42. 20-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  43. 12-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  44. 24-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  45. 20-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  46. 21-Jan-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  47. 23-Nov-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  48. 07-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  49. 04-Sep-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  50. 29-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  51. 23-Jun-2020

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    ADJ

  52. 13-May-2020

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    ADJ

  53. 26-Mar-2020

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    ADJ

  54. 25-Feb-2020

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    ADJ

  55. 30-Jan-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 06-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 4/2020 Court Decision: The Additional Session Judge acquitted accused Murli (son of Gangaram) of charges under IPC Sections 456 (house-breaking) and 376 (rape) on May 12, 2026, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court identified critical investigative gaps including: the First Information Report filed six days after the alleged April 8, 2019 incident without explanation; contradictory witness statements regarding when the victim reported the crime; failure to examine key witnesses present at the crime scene (victim's 6-year-old daughter and 12-year-old sister-in-law); medical examination showing no physical corroboration of rape; and conflicting testimonies about the victim's clothing damage. The court also noted an underlying land dispute between the accused's family and the victim's family, suggesting possible motive for a false complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case