state vs satyanarayan @ sattu Advocate - Mr. Ramesh Chand Meghwal — 191/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,354a. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 13th March 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJJW060008132021
Filing Number
729/2021
Filing Date
22-Dec-2021
Registration No
191/2021
Registration Date
22-Dec-2021
Court
SC ST Jhalawar District HQ
Judge
77-Special Judge SC/ST Cases
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Sentenced
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
393
Police Station
Manoharthana
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.state
Adv. spp
Respondent(s)
-
1.satyanarayan @ sattu Advocate - Mr. Ramesh Chand Meghwal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: 191/2021 Court Decision: The court convicted Satynarayan (alias Sattu) under IPC Sections 354 (outraging modesty of a woman) and 354-A (sexual harassment) and sentenced him to 3 years rigorous imprisonment with ₹20,000 fine for each charge, to run concurrently. Key Facts: A woman reported that on September 15, 2019, the accused grabbed her breast without consent, demanding ₹500 and requesting sexual relations near his home. The victim reported the incident to police on September 18, 2019. Her testimony remained consistent throughout trial and corroborated by supporting witness testimony and documentary evidence, establishing the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
10-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
09-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
06-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
13-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
12-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
07-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
02-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
19-Jan-2026
Final arguments
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
13-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
03-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
12-Dec-2025
Defence Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
06-Dec-2025
Defence Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
01-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
03-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
06-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
10-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
04-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
24-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
24-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
04-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
06-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
31-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge SC/ST Cases
-
01-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court
-
24-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court
-
19-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court
-
15-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court
-
22-Feb-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court
-
21-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court
-
11-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court
-
17-May-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court
-
09-Feb-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 191/2021
Case Summary: 191/2021 Court Decision: The court convicted Satynarayan (alias Sattu) under IPC Sections 354 (outraging modesty of a woman) and 354-A (sexual harassment) and sentenced him to 3 years rigorous imprisonment with ₹20,000 fine for each charge, to run concurrently. Key Facts: A woman reported that on September 15, 2019, the accused grabbed her breast without consent, demanding ₹500 and requesting sexual relations near his home. The victim reported the incident to police on September 18, 2019. Her testimony remained consistent throughout trial and corroborated by supporting witness testimony and documentary evidence, establishing the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts