Ramlal vs Sanju Bai etc — 26/2022

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 18th March 2026.

Cr. Revision

CNR: RJJW060006982022

Case disposed

Filing Number

635/2022

Filing Date

07-10-2022

Registration No

26/2022

Registration Date

07-10-2022

Court

SC ST Jhalawar District HQ

Judge

77-Special Judge SC/ST Cases

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125

Petitioner(s)

Ramlal

Adv. Mr. Rajendra Singh Jhala

Respondent(s)

Sanju Bai etc

Anjali

Hearing History

Judge: 77-Special Judge SC/ST Cases

18-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

11-03-2026

Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

12-02-2026

Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

04-02-2026

Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Order

Summary The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the husband Ramlal's revision petition challenging a maintenance order under Section 125 CrPC. The lower court had directed Ramlal to pay ₹3,000 monthly to his wife Sanjubai and ₹3,000 to their 10-year-old daughter Anjali. The court upheld this order, finding that Ramlal, an able-bodied man with earning capacity, failed to provide sufficient evidence of inability to pay maintenance, and his duty to support his estranged wife and minor child cannot be avoided except on legally permissible grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the husband Ramlal's revision petition challenging a maintenance order under Section 125 CrPC. The lower court had directed Ramlal to pay ₹3,000 monthly to his wife Sanjubai and ₹3,000 to their 10-year-old daughter Anjali. The court upheld this order, finding that Ramlal, an able-bodied man with earning capacity, failed to provide sufficient evidence of inability to pay maintenance, and his duty to support his estranged wife and minor child cannot be avoided except on legally permissible grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SC ST Jhalawar District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case