state vs Parmanand Advocate - Mr. Dheeraj Singh Jhala — 64/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJJW060002502021

Filing Number

218/2021

Filing Date

17-Mar-2021

Registration No

64/2021

Registration Date

17-Mar-2021

Court

SC ST Jhalawar District HQ

Judge

77-Special Judge SC/ST Cases

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

Sarola

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,406
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act Section 3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.state

    Adv. Spl.PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Parmanand Advocate - Mr. Dheeraj Singh Jhala

  2. 2.Yasin Mohd.

    Adv. Mr. Dheeraj Singh Jhala

  3. 3.Late UdayLal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary The court acquitted Paramanand and Yaseen Mohammad (Bablu) of charges under IPC sections 420 (fraud), 406 (criminal breach of trust), and relevant SC/ST Act provisions due to insufficient evidence establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were alleged to have fraudulently sold 12.02 bigha of land to complainant Kazodibai for ₹27 lakhs while failing to deliver complete ownership registration or return the amount, but witness testimonies contained contradictions and key documentary evidence regarding land ownership was inconclusive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  11. 22-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  12. 17-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  13. 11-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  14. 04-Dec-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  15. 28-Nov-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  16. 26-Nov-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  17. 21-Nov-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  18. 17-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  19. 12-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  20. 29-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  21. 09-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  22. 24-Sep-2025

    OrderView PDF

  23. 24-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  24. 10-Sep-2025

    OrderView PDF

  25. 10-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  26. 27-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  27. 13-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  28. 01-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  29. 25-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  30. 17-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  31. 02-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  32. 17-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  33. 28-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  34. 22-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  35. 23-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  36. 31-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Special Judge SC/ST Cases

  37. 21-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  38. 18-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  39. 09-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  40. 01-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  41. 18-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  42. 14-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  43. 12-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  44. 03-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  45. 03-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  46. 27-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  47. 28-Apr-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  48. 16-Feb-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  49. 09-Dec-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  50. 27-Oct-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  51. 22-Sep-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  52. 13-Aug-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  53. 16-Jul-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  54. 08-Jun-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Addl Dist and Session Judge Spl Court

  55. 01-May-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 17-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted Paramanand and Yaseen Mohammad (Bablu) of charges under IPC sections 420 (fraud), 406 (criminal breach of trust), and relevant SC/ST Act provisions due to insufficient evidence establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were alleged to have fraudulently sold 12.02 bigha of land to complainant Kazodibai for ₹27 lakhs while failing to deliver complete ownership registration or return the amount, but witness testimonies contained contradictions and key documentary evidence regarding land ownership was inconclusive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case