state vs Raghuveer etc Advocate - Mr. Ram Babu Maheshwari — 38/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,34. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 10th April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJJW060001382021
Filing Number
124/2021
Filing Date
15-02-2021
Registration No
38/2021
Registration Date
15-02-2021
Court
SC ST Jhalawar District HQ
Judge
77-Special Judge SC/ST Cases
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
FIR Details
FIR Number
356
Police Station
Aklera
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state
Adv. spp
Respondent(s)
Raghuveer etc Advocate - Mr. Ram Babu Maheshwari
Bhagwan Singh
Hearing History
Judge: 77-Special Judge SC/ST Cases
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Jhalawar District Court in Rajasthan convicted two accused, Raghubir (age 25) and Bhagwan Singh (age 20), under IPC Sections 323/34 (voluntarily causing hurt) and SC/ST Act provisions. The court found them guilty of assaulting complainant Panchand on September 24, 2020, based on medical evidence showing injuries, eyewitness testimony, and the FIR. However, the accused were acquitted of more serious charges under Section 341 (wrongful restraint) and Section 3-1(r)(s), 3-2(va) of the SC/ST Act due to insufficient evidence proving intentional caste-based humiliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Jhalawar District Court in Rajasthan convicted two accused, Raghubir (age 25) and Bhagwan Singh (age 20), under IPC Sections 323/34 (voluntarily causing hurt) and SC/ST Act provisions. The court found them guilty of assaulting complainant Panchand on September 24, 2020, based on medical evidence showing injuries, eyewitness testimony, and the FIR. However, the accused were acquitted of more serious charges under Section 341 (wrongful restraint) and Section 3-1(r)(s), 3-2(va) of the SC/ST Act due to insufficient evidence proving intentional caste-based humiliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts