state vs shyam Advocate - Mr. Dheeraj Singh Jhala — 24/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 28th April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJJW060000882021
Filing Number
80/2021
Filing Date
02-02-2021
Registration No
24/2021
Registration Date
03-02-2021
Court
SC ST Jhalawar District HQ
Judge
77-Special Judge SC/ST Cases
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
306
Police Station
Sarola
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state
Adv. spp
Respondent(s)
shyam Advocate - Mr. Dheeraj Singh Jhala
guddi bai
sonu suman
Hearing History
Judge: 77-Special Judge SC/ST Cases
Disposed
Judgment
Final arguments
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Service of Non-bailable warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 21-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 10-04-2026 | Service of Non-bailable warrant |
| 28-03-2026 | Service of Non-bailable warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted two accused (Shyami and Sonu Suman) under IPC Section 302/34 (murder) and SC/ST Act charges, finding insufficient circumstantial evidence linking them to the death of Sisaram, whose body was recovered from a well in Rajasthan on December 7, 2020. The court declared a third accused (Guddi Bai) as absconding, noting the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the murder despite circumstantial evidence, and therefore benefited from the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted two accused (Shyami and Sonu Suman) under IPC Section 302/34 (murder) and SC/ST Act charges, finding insufficient circumstantial evidence linking them to the death of Sisaram, whose body was recovered from a well in Rajasthan on December 7, 2020. The court declared a third accused (Guddi Bai) as absconding, noting the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the murder despite circumstantial evidence, and therefore benefited from the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts