State vs Ramesh Dolatpuriya etc Advocate - R.R.Hada — 43/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 399,402,120B. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 04th May 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJJW050003262017
Filing Number
183/2017
Filing Date
31-03-2017
Registration No
43/2017
Registration Date
21-04-2017
Court
NDPS Jhalawar District HQ
Judge
55-Judge Spl NDPS Court
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. Spl.PP
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Dolatpuriya etc Advocate - R.R.Hada
Hearing History
Judge: 55-Judge Spl NDPS Court
Disposed
Judgment
Final arguments
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 06-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 10-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 43/2017 - State v. Ramesh Dolatpuriya Court Decision: The Special NDPS Judge in Jhalabad acquitted all eight accused persons, benefiting them from the doubt principle. Key Facts: On May 22, 2016, police raided a house in Kalidasii Colony, Jhalabad, based on information about criminal activity. During the operation, firearms and ammunition were seized from five individuals, while two others escaped in a vehicle. The accused were charged under IPC Sections 399, 402, 120-B, 216-A, 216, and Arms Act Sections 3/25 and 7/25 for alleged conspiracy to commit dacoity on a petrol pump. Key Reasoning: The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case: - No independent witnesses were recorded at the scene despite residential area nearby - Serious contradictions existed among police witnesses regarding multiple facts - Recovery of weapons appeared doubtful given the circumstances - Disclosure statements by co-accused lacked independent corroboration - Procedural irregularities and gaps in investigation undermined the case - The prosecution failed to establish assembly for dacoity purpose beyond doubt Judgment: All eight accused—Ramesh Dolatpuriya, Bheem Singh, Shivraj Chaudhry, Raghwir Singh, Manoj alias Guru, Irfan Ali, Rupi Singh, and Shyama alias Shyam Meena—were acquitted due to insufficient evidence and benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 43/2017 - State v. Ramesh Dolatpuriya Court Decision: The Special NDPS Judge in Jhalabad acquitted all eight accused persons, benefiting them from the doubt principle. Key Facts: On May 22, 2016, police raided a house in Kalidasii Colony, Jhalabad, based on information about criminal activity. During the operation, firearms and ammunition were seized from five individuals, while two others escaped in a vehicle. The accused were charged under IPC Sections 399, 402, 120-B, 216-A, 216, and Arms Act Sections 3/25 and 7/25 for alleged conspiracy to commit dacoity on a petrol pump. Key Reasoning: The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case: - No independent witnesses were recorded at the scene despite residential area nearby - Serious contradictions existed among police witnesses regarding multiple facts - Recovery of weapons appeared doubtful given the circumstances - Disclosure statements by co-accused lacked independent corroboration - Procedural irregularities and gaps in investigation undermined the case - The prosecution failed to establish assembly for dacoity purpose beyond doubt Judgment: All eight accused—Ramesh Dolatpuriya, Bheem Singh, Shivraj Chaudhry, Raghwir Singh, Manoj alias Guru, Irfan Ali, Rupi Singh, and Shyama alias Shyam Meena—were acquitted due to insufficient evidence and benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts