Lalit vs State APP — 77/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJJW050001632026

Filing Number

163/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

77/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

NDPS Jhalawar District HQ

Judge

55-Judge Spl NDPS Court

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

Cyber Police Station Jhalawar

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lalit

    Adv. Sh. Prem Chand Meena

  2. 2.Banti meena

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 77/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the bail applications of Lalit Meena and Banti Meena filed under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. Key Reasoning: The court found that the accused are part of an organized syndicate involved in government scheme fraud worth crores of rupees. The investigation revealed a sophisticated operation where the accused falsified beneficiary records and misappropriated funds from the Prime Minister Kisan Samman Nidhi scheme and other welfare programs through multiple linked bank accounts across different states. Given the serious nature of cyber fraud charges, organized criminal conspiracy, and risk of evidence tampering at this investigation stage, the court determined that granting bail would be unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Spl NDPS Court

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 77/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 77/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the bail applications of Lalit Meena and Banti Meena filed under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. Key Reasoning: The court found that the accused are part of an organized syndicate involved in government scheme fraud worth crores of rupees. The investigation revealed a sophisticated operation where the accused falsified beneficiary records and misappropriated funds from the Prime Minister Kisan Samman Nidhi scheme and other welfare programs through multiple linked bank accounts across different states. Given the serious nature of cyber fraud charges, organized criminal conspiracy, and risk of evidence tampering at this investigation stage, the court determined that granting bail would be unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case