Pawan vs State APP — 74/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJJW050001542026

Filing Number

154/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

74/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

NDPS Jhalawar District HQ

Judge

55-Judge Spl NDPS Court

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

228

Police Station

Bakani

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pawan

    Adv. Mr. Rajendra Rawal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Special NDPS Court in Jhalawar, Rajasthan granted bail to petitioner Pawan (age 35) in a second bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that while 9.65 grams of contraband substance was recovered from the petitioner's possession under Section 8/21 NDPS Act, the quantity was minimal, the chargesheet had been filed, and the co-accused had already been granted bail on similar facts, making the petitioner's bail application justified. Bail was granted on furnishing personal recognizance of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of ₹50,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Spl NDPS Court

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Special NDPS Court in Jhalawar, Rajasthan granted bail to petitioner Pawan (age 35) in a second bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that while 9.65 grams of contraband substance was recovered from the petitioner's possession under Section 8/21 NDPS Act, the quantity was minimal, the chargesheet had been filed, and the co-accused had already been granted bail on similar facts, making the petitioner's bail application justified. Bail was granted on furnishing personal recognizance of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of ₹50,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case