Shrawan vs State APP — 65/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 09th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJJW050001412026
Filing Number
141/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
65/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
NDPS Jhalawar District HQ
Judge
55-Judge Spl NDPS Court
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Refused
FIR Details
FIR Number
49
Police Station
Sarola
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shrawan
Adv. Sh. Rajesh Gupta
Respondent(s)
State APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 55-Judge Spl NDPS Court
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Special NDPS Court in Jhalawar, Rajasthan rejected the bail application of Shravan (age 35) on March 9, 2026. The court found that 56 grams of MDMA (heroin) was recovered from the applicant's possession, and investigation revealed he had previously trafficked 3 quintals of MDMA in Jodhpur by packaging it into small packets for distribution. Given his prior criminal record under the NDPS Act and the serious nature of commercial drug trafficking charges under Sections 8/15 and 30 of the NDPS Act, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Special NDPS Court in Jhalawar, Rajasthan rejected the bail application of Shravan (age 35) on March 9, 2026. The court found that 56 grams of MDMA (heroin) was recovered from the applicant's possession, and investigation revealed he had previously trafficked 3 quintals of MDMA in Jodhpur by packaging it into small packets for distribution. Given his prior criminal record under the NDPS Act and the serious nature of commercial drug trafficking charges under Sections 8/15 and 30 of the NDPS Act, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts