Shrawan vs State APP — 65/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJJW050001412026

Filing Number

141/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

65/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

NDPS Jhalawar District HQ

Judge

55-Judge Spl NDPS Court

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

49

Police Station

Sarola

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shrawan

    Adv. Sh. Rajesh Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Special NDPS Court in Jhalawar, Rajasthan rejected the bail application of Shravan (age 35) on March 9, 2026. The court found that 56 grams of MDMA (heroin) was recovered from the applicant's possession, and investigation revealed he had previously trafficked 3 quintals of MDMA in Jodhpur by packaging it into small packets for distribution. Given his prior criminal record under the NDPS Act and the serious nature of commercial drug trafficking charges under Sections 8/15 and 30 of the NDPS Act, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Spl NDPS Court

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Judge Spl NDPS Court

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 65/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Special NDPS Court in Jhalawar, Rajasthan rejected the bail application of Shravan (age 35) on March 9, 2026. The court found that 56 grams of MDMA (heroin) was recovered from the applicant's possession, and investigation revealed he had previously trafficked 3 quintals of MDMA in Jodhpur by packaging it into small packets for distribution. Given his prior criminal record under the NDPS Act and the serious nature of commercial drug trafficking charges under Sections 8/15 and 30 of the NDPS Act, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case