Mukesh kumar vs State APP — 66/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJJW050001402026

Filing Number

140/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

66/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

NDPS Jhalawar District HQ

Judge

55-Judge Spl NDPS Court

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

Jhalarapatan

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mukesh kumar

    Adv. Sh. Rajesh Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Special NDPS Court in Jhalarad, Rajasthan granted bail to Mukesh Kumar under Section 483 CrPC on March 7, 2026. The court held that while 5.9 grams of smack was recovered from co-accused Vijay Meena allegedly intended for the applicant, previous criminal records alone cannot justify bail denial, citing Supreme Court precedent that "grave offences and pending cases cannot be the sole basis for bail refusal." The court imposed bail conditions requiring a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of ₹50,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Spl NDPS Court

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Judge Spl NDPS Court

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 66/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special NDPS Court in Jhalarad, Rajasthan granted bail to Mukesh Kumar under Section 483 CrPC on March 7, 2026. The court held that while 5.9 grams of smack was recovered from co-accused Vijay Meena allegedly intended for the applicant, previous criminal records alone cannot justify bail denial, citing Supreme Court precedent that "grave offences and pending cases cannot be the sole basis for bail refusal." The court imposed bail conditions requiring a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of ₹50,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case