Mukesh kumar vs State APP — 66/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 07th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJJW050001402026
Filing Number
140/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
66/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
NDPS Jhalawar District HQ
Judge
55-Judge Spl NDPS Court
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
Jhalarapatan
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mukesh kumar
Adv. Sh. Rajesh Gupta
Respondent(s)
State APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 55-Judge Spl NDPS Court
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special NDPS Court in Jhalarad, Rajasthan granted bail to Mukesh Kumar under Section 483 CrPC on March 7, 2026. The court held that while 5.9 grams of smack was recovered from co-accused Vijay Meena allegedly intended for the applicant, previous criminal records alone cannot justify bail denial, citing Supreme Court precedent that "grave offences and pending cases cannot be the sole basis for bail refusal." The court imposed bail conditions requiring a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of ₹50,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Special NDPS Court in Jhalarad, Rajasthan granted bail to Mukesh Kumar under Section 483 CrPC on March 7, 2026. The court held that while 5.9 grams of smack was recovered from co-accused Vijay Meena allegedly intended for the applicant, previous criminal records alone cannot justify bail denial, citing Supreme Court precedent that "grave offences and pending cases cannot be the sole basis for bail refusal." The court imposed bail conditions requiring a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 and two sureties of ₹50,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts