State vs Kailashchand etc Advocate - Mr. Avinash Gupta — 27/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,,336,,341,,323,,504,,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 22nd May 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJJW010008122022
Filing Number
698/2022
Filing Date
15-03-2022
Registration No
27/2022
Registration Date
15-03-2022
Court
DJ ADJ Jhalawar District HQ
Judge
11-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
Kailashchand etc Advocate - Mr. Avinash Gupta
Kalulal
Durgashankar
Hearing History
Judge: 11-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Defence Evidence
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 12-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 02-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 18-04-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Kailashchand and Others (CIS 27/2022) Court Decision (22.05.2026): The Sessions Court acquitted accused Kailashchand (rape charge under IPC 376) and all three accused (Kailashchand, Kalulal, and Durgashankar) of charges under IPC 341, 323, 323/34, 506, 506/34. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, citing significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies, unexplained three-year delay in reporting an alleged 2018 rape, contradictions between written and oral statements, and unsubstantiated medical evidence—resulting in reasonable doubt favoring the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State v. Kailashchand and Others (CIS 27/2022) Court Decision (22.05.2026): The Sessions Court acquitted accused Kailashchand (rape charge under IPC 376) and all three accused (Kailashchand, Kalulal, and Durgashankar) of charges under IPC 341, 323, 323/34, 506, 506/34. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, citing significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies, unexplained three-year delay in reporting an alleged 2018 rape, contradictions between written and oral statements, and unsubstantiated medical evidence—resulting in reasonable doubt favoring the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts